Which statement about peer feedback is NOT accurate?

The statement regarding peer feedback that is not accurate is that peer feedback helps prevent errors from over-familiarity with one's own work. While peer feedback certainly aids in providing an outside perspective and may help identify issues that the writer has overlooked due to familiarity, it does not inherently prevent such errors. The writer's own familiarity with their work is what typically leads to overlooking mistakes, and peer feedback's effectiveness is contingent upon the reviewer’s ability to provide informed and constructive critiques.

The other statements correctly emphasize the benefits of peer feedback. Providing feedback can enhance one’s critical assessment skills, enabling individuals to develop a more discerning eye for their own writing. It is often more comfortable to seek help from peers rather than instructors due to the perceived power dynamics or strain in the student-teacher relationship. Lastly, the caution about potential perceptions of cheating underscores the importance of ethics in collaborative feedback and highlights considerations that writers should keep in mind when engaging with peer review.